Thursday 1 September 2005


by Anthony Summers, Don DeLillo, Elias Demetracopoulos, G. Robert Blakey, Gerald Posner, Jefferson Morley, Jim Lesar, John McAdams, John Newman, Norman Mailer, Paul Hoch, Richard Whalen, Robbyn Swan, Scott Armstrong, Vincent Bugliosi

Response by Trowbridge H. Ford

To the Editors:

It is disappointing to learn that the Central Intelligence Agency filed motions in federal court in May 2005 to block disclosure of records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy forty-one years ago.

In response to the journalist Jefferson Morley's lawsuit brought under the Freedom of Information Act, the CIA is seek-ing to prevent release of records about a deceased CIA operations officer named George E. Joannides.

Joannides's story is clearly of substantial historical interest. CIA records show that the New Orleans chapter of a Cuban exile group that Joannides guided and monitored in Miami had a series of encounters with the accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald three months before Kennedy was murdered. Fifteen years later, Joannides also served as the agency's liaison to the House Select Committee on Assassinations. He did not disclose his role in the events of 1963 to Congress. The public record of the assassination and its confused investigatory aftermath will not be complete without his story.

The spirit of the law is clear. The JFK Records Act of 1992, approved unanimously by Congress, mandated that all assassination-related records be reviewed and disclosed "immediately."

When Morley filed his lawsuit in December 2003, thirteen published JFK authors supported his request for the records in an open letter to The New York Review of Books (

Eighteen months later, the CIA is still stonewalling. The agency now acknowledges that it possesses an undisclosed number of documents related to Joannides's actions and responsibilities in 1963 which it will not release in any form. Thus records related to Kennedy's assassination are still being hidden for reasons of "national security."

As published authors of divergent views on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, we say the agency's position is spurious and untenable. Its continuing non-compliance with the JFK Records Act does no service to the public. It defies the will of Congress. It obscures the public record on a subject of enduring national interest. It encourages conspiracy mongering. And it undermines public confidence in the intelligence community at a time when collective security requires the opposite.

We insist the CIA observe the spirit of the 1992 JFK Assassination Records Act by immediately releasing all relevant records on the activities of George Joannides and any records at all that include his name or relate in any way to the assassination story—as prescribed by the JFK Records Act. The law and common sense require it.

G. Robert Blakey, former general counsel, House Select Committee on Assassinations
Jefferson Morley, journalist
Scott Armstrong, founder National Security Archive
Vincent Bugliosi, author and former prosecutor
Elias Demetracopoulos, retired journalist
Stephen Dorril, University of Huddersfield
Don DeLillo, author of Libra
Paul Hoch, JFK researcher
David Kaiser, Naval War College
Michael Kurtz, Southeastern Louisiana University, author of Crime of the Century
George Lardner, Jr., journalist
Jim Lesar, Assassination Archives and Research Center
Norman Mailer, author of Oswald's Tale
John McAdams, moderator, alt.assassination.jfk
John Newman, author of Oswald and the CIA
Gerald Posner, author of Case Closed
Oliver Stone, director JFK
Anthony Summers, author of Not in Your Lifetime
Robbyn Swan, author
David Talbot, founding editor,
Cyril Wecht, coroner, Allegheny County, PA
Richard Whalen, author of Founding Father
Gordon Winslow, former archivist of Dade County, Florida.
David Wrone, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, author The Zapruder Film

Full story...


The letter, entitled "Blocked", republished from the New York Review of Books is the biggest bunch of obfuscation yet from a select group of supporters and critics of the Warren Commission's finding that Lee Harvey Oswald alone killed JFK. To make a big stink about the CIA not revealing documents relating to its George E. Joannides' dealings with the New Orleans chapter of the DRE when it contacted the President's alleged assassin in New Orelans in August 1963 - what brings together most diverse investigators like Gerald Posner, John Newman, Paul Hoch, and Robert Blakey - has to be the lowest comman demoninator yet when it comes to Dallas conspiracy studies.

Instead of demanding to know what went on in New Orleans with Joannides' minions, they should be demanding to know what he, a person they had no interest in until long after he died, was doing in the Miami Station as chief of its of Psychological Warfare Branch. There, the Agency was conducting a new series of "secret war" operations against Cuba, "JM/WAVE, headed by "loose cannon" William King Harvey. As Anthony Summers, another signer of the letter concluded in The Kennedy Conspiracy, "he may have been the key in accomplishing the assassination." (p. 529)

Joannides' assignment for Harvey was to put the President through a series of threats which would become impossible to protect against if JFK ever hoped to gain re-election - what would give the killers Harvey had Jack Ruby assemble in Dallas the opportunity to assassinate him.

When JFK visited Miami the week before the Dallas shooting, Joannides had the Secret Service so scared that he would be assassinated that the President looked like he expected it, given the countermeasures it took. The dais he delivered a speech to a selected audience from, for example, seemed to reporters to be bullet-proof.

The success of this psy-ops operation left JFK naked to his enemies when he visited Dallas, thanks to the assistance that former Vice President Richard Nixon gave to the process by claiming to everyone that he needed no protection - see especially the "Guard Not For Nixon" story, advertized on the front page of The Dallas Morning News on the fatal morning.

In sum, making a mountain out of what happened in New Orleans is a complete diversion by one and all for what Joannides help accomplish in Miami and Dallas, making one wonder if they will ever get a grip on what really happened on November 22, 1963.