Spaniards Dump Right Wing Scumbag

The voxmeister at his vitriolic best!

by voxfux

Terrorist crusader wannabee scumbag (Spanish Prime Minister Jose Aznar) was thrown out of office for defying the will of 90% of his own people, sucking on the Neo-Con shaft, and signing up to kill innocent Iraqi women and children so that Bush and his filthy Neo Con terrorists can loot the oil of Iraq under the bogus rubric of a "Coalition of the Willing". What a piece of shit Aznar was. As is any low life scum "leader" who actually defies the will of 90% his own people and joins with Bushes oil looting spree. Good Riddens to this piece of shit who soiled the capital of Spain. And solidarity to the people of Spain who who are not as gullible and docile as Americans appear to be.

In what appears to be yet another CIA terrorist attack on the Madrid railway station (Nearly all major terrorist attacks are CIA - NOT AL QUEADA) the spooks once again miscalculated - fucked up as usual and their fuck-up had the exact opposite effect. The spooks thought that if they kill enough innocent people, surely the Spanish people would cower under the nearest right wing terrorist thug like the sheep here in America did. Maybe these dumb spooks thought that the spanish people would get caught up in convulsing jolts of thuggish hypernationalism and start waving flags in a frenzy of mindless jingoism like Americans did. But Europeans are not that stupid and gullible. They have some dignity and some brains still left in their heads.

It is clear that CIA sponsored terrorism only has the intended effects on populations whose minds are controlled by CIA produced "news" such as is the case in America where the American's minds are completely controlled by the CIA produced, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX. It's the one-two punch. The CIA orchestrates the attacks and then they orchestrate the angry jingoistic nationalistic impassioned response. Yet even under such a tight clampdown on all forms of truth and free thought here is America, there are signs that mass numbers of Americans are no longer buying the CIA controlled story about this boogyman called "Al Queada" (which in itself is a documented operational arm of the CIA.) People are turning away in droves from the Major TV media and turning to alternative forms of media to get the real story about what is really happening to their world.

And why are they doing that? Could it be because Americans are now currently on the receiving end of the biggest fucking ever handed down to Americans by the billionaires who own America? Could it be because never in the history of America have the billionaires been so greedy and immoral and terroristic? Could it possibly be because they have stolen all there is to steal from the American people and we are reaching a breaking point? Can it be because these dying billionaire geezers on on their last crusade and are just so full of their own impending death that in their typical satanic soleless self, they wish to take as many of us down with them as possible? Could it be that the Neo-Cons, with their Zionist patsies, and their Council of Foreign Relations reptiles are perhaps the dumbest idiots ever on the face of the earth who's every single plan fails?

The answer is: ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Name one terrorist act of the Council of Foreign Relations which ever worked?

THE CFR thought that by attacking the twin towers they could steal the oil of Iraq - WELL THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN.

Pipelines? - good Luck!

Conquest of Eurasia? - fat fucking chance!

The Council of Foreign Relations IS THE WORLDS LEADING TERRORIST ORGANIZATION AND MUST BE DESTROYED! Not only because they plan and execute the attacks but because EVERY SINGLE PLAN THEY PRODUCE FUCKS UP AND FAILS. THEY ARE THE WORLDS BIGGEST FAILURES IN THE HISTORY OF FAILURES.

We would have better luck with some two bit islamic militants than with the CFR - because with all their stuffed shirts and pocket protectors these idiots have miscalculated one right after another and are destroying the republic.

The people of the world are waking up and resisting the terror from the United States, the CIA, the CFR, the Neo-cons, the Billionaires, the Bushes. The question is will the American people finally wake up and resist the attacks by the CIA and the Neo Cons before it is too late and they end up ruining the this great republic or will this awakening be crushed by the lying media and the people of America be brought into a dark dark police state shithole.

VoxNYC

Third Possibility In Madrid Bombings

As usual, the only REAL news coming out of Madrid is coming via the Internet, the "analysis" done by the mainstream media is beyond a joke.

"Usual suspects" announced almost immediately after the March 11th Madrid bombings were (1) Basque separatists and (2) al-Qaeda. Suggested by very few is a third possible suspect, having its roots in the post-World War II "Operation Gladio."

In 1948, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) set up a clandestine army in Italy. This was called "Operation Gladio" (from Latin, gladius, meaning sword). Italy was torn between the left (Communists) and the right (Fascists). Operation Gladio's purpose was to overthrow the Italian government if it went Communist. [1]

So too is the Roman Catholic Church, headquartered in Italy, internally torn between the left (e.g. Liberation Theology) and the right (e.g. Opus Dei). Pope John Paul I, "the smiling Pope," received every issue of a magazine published by Mino Pecorelli. Pecorelli, formerly a member of a secret Masonic society called Propaganda Due (P2), charged that 100 Freemasons had infiltrated the Vatican. Pope John Paul I ordered an investigation of the Vatican Bank but soon thereafter was assassinated. [2]

So when considering the Roman Catholic Church one needs to be specific about which Church: the right-wing Church or the left-wing Church.

Propaganda Due (P2), according to author Robert Anton Wilson, was "probably founded by Licio Gelli sometime in the 1970s, as part of CIA's Gladio operation..." [3] This seems to be the Freemasonic infiltration warned of by Pecorelli, which apparently is still entrenched in the Vatican. Pecorelli also claimed that P2 was funded by the CIA. [4]

The connecting webs are subtle. "The P2 story caused a major scandal in Europe but received scant attention in the American media..." [4] The facts that P2 founder Licio Gelli was a guest at Ronald Reagan's inauguration and was a chum of George Herbert Walker Bush are tantalizing tidbits. The P2 reliance upon a "Strategy of Tension" to further their aims is more germane.

The "Strategy of Tension" was (is) "a carefully designed plan to fabricate so much leftist terrorism that the Italians would demand an authoritarian or even fascist government." [4] In the United States, a similar nefarious strategy was revealed by James Bamford in his book, Body Of Secrets: "...the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. In the name of anticommunism, they proposed a secret and bloody war of terrorism against their own country in order to trick the American public..." That plan for provocative terror against their own people in order to gain their support for fighting a Big Enemy was codenamed Operation Northwoods and was conceived in the early 1960s. [5]

The mist-shrouded activities of true hidden power appear only in glimpses. One glimpse is the Freemasonic propensity for symbolism paired with the numeric signatures on the September 11, 2001 terror events (9/11) and the Madrid March 11, 2004 terror events occurring 911 days after the infamous "9/11." Another glimpse is the 1980 bombing of a railway station in Bologna, Italy, reportedly originated by P2. [1]

Full story...

The Meaning of Madrid

The road to World War IV

by Justin Raimondo

The neocons wanted a new world war – and now they have it. That is the meaning of the Madrid attacks, in which 201 people were killed and over a thousand wounded, for which Al Qaeda has taken responsibility.

In the run-up to the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the neoconservative network – which had been agitating for war in the Middle East for over a decade – came up with a new brand name for their product. Writing in the Wall Street Journal as the Afghan War was lighting up the skies over Kabul, neocon academic Eliot Cohen, the Clausewitz of the War Party, disdained the platitudinous habits of politicians who refused to call things by their right names. Shall we call it the "Afghan War"? No, too limited, he averred:

"The '9/11 War,' perhaps? But the war began well before Sept. 11, and its casualties include, at the very least, the dead and wounded in our embassies in Africa, on the U.S.S Cole and, possibly, in Somalia and the Khobar Towers. 'Osama bin Laden's War'? There are precedents for this in history (King Philip's War, Pontiac's War, or even The War of Jenkins' Ear), but the war did not begin with bin Laden and will not end with his death, which may come sooner than anyone had anticipated – including, one hopes, the man himself. A less palatable but more accurate name is World War IV. The Cold War was World War III, which reminds us that not all global conflicts entail the movement of multimillion-man armies, or conventional front lines on a map."

The war did not begin with Bin Laden – that strangely counterintuitive concept is the key to understanding the mindset of the cabal that lied us into war. The neoconservatives have long argued that Islam itself, and not just the radical incarnation represented by Al Qaeda, is the implacable enemy that has displaced Communism as our principal adversary on the world stage. They didn't need 9/11 to confirm this, although they naturally jumped at the opportunity it provided, just as they are pouncing on the Madrid attacks as justifying their anti-Islamic jihad.

In mythologizing 9/11 – and, now, 3/11 – Cohen and his co-thinkers, including Norman Podhoretz and former CIA chieftain James Woolsey, have separated the act from its perpetrators. It doesn't matter that the millions of Muslims the world over who resent the United States for its intervention in the Middle East and its unconditional support to the Likud government in Tel Aviv had nothing to do with the destruction of the World Trade Center, the attack on the Pentagon, or the cowardly bombing of the trains in Spain. The whole lot of them are involved in the commission of a "hate crime," and therefore beyond the pale.

Before 9/11, there was very little support for this sort of fanaticism, except among the numerically tiny neoconservative sect and their Christian Right footsoldiers, whose singular focus on the interests of the Israeli state spring from opposite and yet ultimately congruent theologies. The neoconservative cadre who filled the second-and –third tier positions in the national security bureaucracy had been pushing "finishing the job" in Iraq for a decade, and, when they successfully flooded the newly-installed Bush II White House personnel office with their resumes, they brought their agenda with them.

In the wake of the biggest terrorist attack in American history – not counting state-sponsored terrorism – this exotic ideological blossom became the official ideology of Bush administration. The only difference being that the new dispensation was now out in the open.

The Spanish events have stimulated the War Party into new heights of hysterical righteousness. Amidst the loud gnashing of neocon teeth and the facile anti-European rhetoric of the new American nativists (the loudest of whom are, oddly, Canadians) the clear-eyed analysis of Middle East scholar Juan Cole stands out like a beacon of reason:

"I believe that the Spanish public just recognized the correctness of the 'opportunity cost' argument about the Iraq War and anti-terrorism efforts. Let's say you are in business. If you put your capital, which is limited, into expanding one part of your business ('X'), you may make money – say 7% percent on your investment. But you had another opportunity to put your money into expanding a different part of the business ('Y'), and that would have given you a 25% percent return (which you did not know at the time). Giving up the 25% return is an opportunity cost of doing X rather than Y.

"The Iraq War represents an enormous opportunity cost in the counter-insurgency struggle against al-Qaeda and its constituents," he continues. Instead of going after Bin Laden, in Afghanistan, the Bush administration went after Iraq, as Al Qaeda "struck at Mombasa, Bali, Riyadh, Casablanca, Istanbul, Madrid and elsewhere."

Pointing out that not even the attack on a Spanish cultural center in Morocco gave the Aznar government some reason to expect they were a target – they were too busy defending their decision to send Spanish troops to Iraq against the 91 percent of the voters who oppose it – Professor Cole poses a few pertinent questions:

"How much did Spain spend to go after the culprits in Casablanca? How much did Bush dedicate to that effort? How much did they instead invest in military efforts in Iraq?

"Instead of dealing with this growing and world-wide threat, the Bush administration cynically took advantage of the American public's anger and fear after September 11 and channeled it against the regime of Saddam Hussein, which had had nothing to do with September 11 and which never could be involved in such a terrorist operation on American soil because its high officers knew exactly the retribution that would be visited on them. Only an asymmetrical organization could think of a September 11, because it has no exact return address. Even for a state to give aid to such an operation against a super power would be suicide – how could you be sure the superpower would not find out about the aid?"

Given what we are learning about ingredients that went into the "cooked" intelligence the White House fed Congress and the American people, how could you be sure that they wouldn't just fake the evidence? After all, that's what they did to Iraq. The question now is: who's next?

Full story...

Officials: Group tying self to blasts may not be real

"I'm tired of this back-slapping 'Isn't humanity neat?' bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are." -= Bill Hicks

A group purporting to be part of Al Qaeda that claimed responsibility for the Madrid train bombings and warned of a looming attack on the United States seems to be a phantom organization, according to US intelligence officials and terrorism specialists.

In a 24-hour news cycle dominated by fears of terrorism, the latest e-mail from the Abu Hafs al Masri Brigade to a London-based Arabic newspaper sowed anxiety and drew instant headlines all over the world.

But specialists say there is no evidence the organization exists. E-mail messages purporting to be written by the group previously claimed responsibility for everything from the North American blackout to a suicide attack that killed 20 Italian policemen in Iraq. But none of those claims has proved true, intelligence specialists say.

The latest message warned that an attack against the United States is "90 percent ready."

Employees at the Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper in London, which has received several letters in recent months purporting to be from the group, say they are not sure what the group is.

Deciphering the group -- which first surfaced in July 2003 -- illustrates a larger challenge for counterterrorism officials: assessing the murky world of purported Al Qaeda splinter groups that have been responsible for a dramatic increase in highly sophisticated terrorist bombings around the world.

Spanish officials said yesterday they had no concrete evidence of Al Qaeda involvement in the Thursday attacks, and continued to identify ETA -- a Basque separatist group -- as one suspect.

But the worldwide attention generated by the Abu Hafs al Masri e-mail, received hours after the attacks occurred, demonstrated how easily threats purported to be from Al Qaeda can be spread. Terrorism analysts say such claims form part of the tactics of psychological warfare and propaganda, designed to capitalize on actual violence and deepen public fear of more attacks.

"It goes to the more virtual nature of Al Qaeda," said Peter Bergen, a terrorism specialist at the New America Foundation in Washington. "Some are real; some are waging psychological warfare."

Full story...

Spain got the point

If the Bushies gave a rats arse about democracy they would have allowed all the votes to be counted in the election and not relied on their GOP buddies on the Supreme Court to hand them the White House. They don't are about "democracy" or "freedom" or "liberty" or any of the other buzzwords they love using, what they do care about is sucking the corporate cock.

By defaming the Spanish while Madrid weeps, the Bushites display a sneaking contempt for democracy

by Jonathan Freedland

Maybe they think it's payback time. In 2001, many American conservatives were appalled by the reaction in some European quarters to 9/11, a reaction crudely summarised as "America had it coming". They insisted it was grossly insensitive to attack the United States and its foreign policy while Ground Zero still smouldered. They were right and I took their side, urging people at least to pause a while before adding greater hurt to an already traumatised nation.

But look what's happening now. A matter of days after the event branded Europe's 9/11, and American conservatives - including some of the very people who were so outraged by the criticisms hurled at the US in September 2001 - have started whacking not just Spanish policy, but the Spanish people.

Witness David Brooks in yesterday's New York Times, outraged that the Madrid bombings prompted Spanish voters to "throw out the old government and replace it with one whose policies are more to al-Qaida's liking. What is the Spanish word for appeasement?" Rightwing blog artist Andrew Sullivan also raided the 1930s lexicon for the same, exhausted word: "It seems clear to me that the trend in Europe is now either appeasement of terror or active alliance with it. It is hard to view the results in Spain as anything but a choice between Bush and al-Qaida. Al-Qaida won." Not to be outdone, former Bush speechwriter David Frum, the man who coined "axis of evil", sighed at the weakness of the Spanish: "People are not always strong. Sometimes they indulge false hopes that by lying low, truckling, appeasing, they can avoid danger and strife ... And this is what seems to have happened in Spain."

Perhaps this is how the Bushites hope to avenge what they saw as European insensitivity two and half years ago, by defaming the Spanish even as Madrid still weeps. But this assault should not go unanswered if only because, if allowed to settle in the public mind, it will widen yet further the already yawning transatlantic gulf of misunderstanding.

Put aside the imprecision (and worse) that comes with the abuse of the word "appeasement": the menace of al-Qaida is real and serious enough without making hyperbolic comparisons to the Third Reich. Focus instead on the two grave errors that underlie this latest argument from the right. One is a misunderstanding of democracy, the other is a failure to make crucial distinctions.

The first mistake is the more surprising, for no word is invoked more often in support of the "war on terror" than democracy. Yet these insults hurled at the Spanish show a sneaking contempt for the idea. For surely the Spanish did nothing more on Sunday than exercise their democratic right to change governments. They elected the Socialist party; to suggest they voted for al-Qaida is a slur not only on the Spanish nation but on the democratic process itself, implying that when terrorists strike political choice must end.

It comes from the same mentality that prompted Republicans in 2002 to run TV ads against the Democratic senator Max Cleland, who lost three limbs in the Vietnam war, placing his face alongside those of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. It is the same thinking that led one Republican congressman to quip recently that a vote in November for John Kerry will be a vote for Osama. It is a bid to reshape the political landscape, so that parties of the right stand on one side and all the rest are lumped in with al-Qaida. The tactic is McCarthyite, the natural extension of the bullying insistence that, in President Bush's own words, "You are either with us or you're with the terrorists". If that is the choice, then there is no choice: it is a mandate for a collection of one-party states.

But this is not the heart of the matter. The right's greater error is its failure to distinguish between the war against al-Qaida and the war on Iraq. About 90% of the Spanish electorate were against the latter; there is no evidence that they were, or are, soft on the former. On the contrary, there have been two mass demonstrations of Spanish opinion in the past few days: let no one forget that 36 hours before the election, about 11 million Spaniards took to the streets to swear their revulsion at terrorism. It takes some cheek to accuse a nation like that of weakness and appeasement.

The Spaniards showed they knew the difference between the struggle against al-Qaida and the conflict in Iraq. It is hardly a shock that this distinction is lost on the likes of Frum and company: the Bush administration worked tirelessly to conflate the two, constantly eliding Saddam and 9/11 even though the president himself has had to admit no evidence links the two.

Full story...

Vietnam, Madrid, & The Reversal Of War Policy

by Sherman H. Skolnick

Suppose you put your ear to the ground and heard something a-coming, from afar off. Would that foresight make you rich and famous? Depending on the historic era, you might get widely heckled, if not condemned, by your countrymen. Why? Because opposing the common wisdom of the times can be greatly misunderstood.

It was 1967 and the Viet Nam conflict was approaching full boil. In the Spring of that year was a sensational series of articles, principally in the New York Times. Other publications and media outlets pretty much ignored it. Documents were uncovered showing the American CIA was widely controlling various supposedly dissident and other domestic groups.

The CIA funds were funneled through three layers, technically described as conduits, pass-throughs, and fronts. [Well equipped public Libraries have a set of volumes, called New York Time Index, summarizing articles, year by year. If the Library still have the one for 1967, you can review a summary of the CIA items listing many of the Foundations implicated.]

Much later, Kennedy Administration left-over U.S. Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, was privately accused of causing these disclosures. Some later claimed it let to his political assassination in 1968, blamed, as usual, on a "lone assassin".

Sensing a break-through, we grabbed up copies of public records, before they would become "unavailable", to trace what groups claiming to be dissidents were fronting for the American secret political police. It enabled us to later show that the so-called American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU, had become defunct in 1967, and had been quietly bought out by a spy agency operation, the Roger Baldwin Foundation. Yet, the press even now refers to them as the American Civil Liberties Union, a non-existent organization.

[About 1990, the Nation Magazine, funded in part by CIA Foundation funds, ran a story about CIA's competitor, the FBI. Namely that for many years after World War Two, the ACLU was a spy-front for the FBI. Ha! Ha! That was one way of the CIA sticking it to the FBI.]

As to the New York Times 1967 series, the records in question were IRS Form 990-A, for foundations, which unlike the income tax returns of corporations and individuals have to be a public record. The records are kept by the District boss of the IRS in the district the foundation shows as a headquarters. For 50 cents a page or so, the IRS office supposedly has to furnish you copies. [A private research group, Donors Forum, with offices in major U.S. cities, over the years were among those which kept copies of some of these Forms.]

[Scroll way down our website www.skolnicksreport.com for story "A Short History of CIA Fronts".]

In the same year 1967, was a huge supposedly peacenik-type convention in Chicago. Called "The New Politics", it was convened at a fancy old hotel, the Palmer House, that strangely charged a knock-down rate of eight dollars a day for rooms for those registering for the convention and staying at the hotel.

The brains behind the affair was a local political analyst guru, Don Rose, a likeable fellow with a full-mouth of rhetoric sympathetic to naive anti-war types. Not known to us at the time, his then father-in-law was a top official of the wire-service, United Press International. (Several years later UPI's internal documents, showing the CIA link, fell into our possession.)

There was too much strange money behind the week-long gabfest. Present with his seemingly peace-loving mouthing-off was Rennard C. Davis, called "Rennie", a cute way to make him acceptable. Not known at the time, he was the son of a Frenchmen with links to the French CIA, and the elder Davis became the top advisor in the White House, after 1968, to then President Richard M. Nixon. And note our earlier stories in this series how the French CIA infiltrated the Dallas plot to assassinate President Kennedy, took secret films of the happening, and have used it ever since to blackmail favors out of the U.S.

Years later we uncovered that Don Rose was reportedly financed by a CIA-linked foundation. (In 1969, when I got a few minutes on the local TV, fingering him and Rennie, Don Rose ended up persuading me to allow him to visit me in my home, where he threatened harm against me, such as if I did not shut up, he would see to it that the media would never cover my viewpoints of court reform or anything else.)

In 1967, anyone with something to say to his fellow citizens was at the mercy of the monopoly press. In Chicago, to be acceptable to local media, dissidents had to go through Don Rose. No Internet, no radio talk shows were widely functioning, no public access Cable TV. Just the liars and whores of the press.

At the New Politics convention, I sensed a reversal coming, of the national and international policy of the U.S. as to the Viet Nam War. The "powers that be", the Establishment, the Ruling Class---THEM---wanted somewhere in the future to extricate themselves from the blunder. Instead, they wanted to explore offshore Viet Nam for oil.

Every time I tried to speak up at the huge public gathering in the Ball Room of the fancy old Hotel, I was snubbed, shouted down, and threatened to be shoved out. Known supposed peace-nik leaders did not allow any real questions to be asked.

Full story...

Myahudi Monsters Maul Madrid

I was waiting for this one.... Some interesting analysis from Mr. Vialls.

"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Joe Vialls

Within seconds of the first deadly explosions inside and outside Madrid's Atocha station, you could sense that the culprits to be blamed for this crime would be Osama Bin Laden and the fictional 'al Qaeda', but there was no point in writing about it then. The first three days immediately following the ten synchronized military explosions were pure unashamed George Orwell time, with Christian and Judaic media alike completely immersing the general public in their predictable mind games.

First it was claimed the perpetrators were members of Euskadi Ta Askatasuna [ETA] which means "Basque Homeland and Freedom," and a gratifying roar of spontaneous anger could instantly be heard all over the country. Relatives of the dead and injured badly needed somebody to hate, and the homespun terrorists from the northern Basque region of Spain would suffice in the first instance. This distraction served to focus public attention several hundred miles away from the four primary crime scenes, where closer inspection would surely have generated some very awkward questions for the Spanish authorities.

Then only a few hours later in what appeared to be a chilling and apparently stupid rerun of 9-11, police officers were tipped off by media about a suspicious white van parked near Alcala de Henares railway station, which was then found to contain a handful of detonators, and several Muslim religious tracts on a cassette tape. So the 'al Qaeda' fix was already in, though the media deliberately played it down at this early stage. As we will shortly discover, the western media already knew that the platform surveillance videotapes at Alcala de Henares showed no trace of any "Muslim Terrorists" boarding any of the four bombed trains, but did not wish local police to discover this glaring omission.

After a suitable delay during which the crimes scenes grew cold, and critical evidence was removed, the London-based Arabic newspaper, al-Quds al-Arabi, suddenly announced that it had received a letter from the Brigade of Abu Hafs al-Masri, claiming the bombings for al-Qaeda. This was the signal for global media networks to convert millions of sheeple all around the world, from their existing belief that Catholic Basques were responsible for the atrocity, to the newly-generated fiction that dangerous Muslim 'terrorists' had somehow slipped into Spain under the radar, and blown up four trains. This stunning religious conversion was reinforced when police found a planted unexploded haversack bomb in one of the train wrecks, which contained copper rather than aluminum detonators traditionally used by the Basques.

Unfortunately, since minute zero on day one, western media outlets had made a deliberate omission so inexplicable and so gross that it proved their own direct involvement or complicity in the mass murder of more than 200 Spanish civilians. Despite the fact that every media outlet taking its lead from the omnipotent New York Times reported that between eight and ten explosive devices had been detonated on board Spanish trains during the rush hour, not one of them mentioned suicide bombers. This is an impossible omission, because we all know that every car, or bus or plane or train blown up anywhere by 'Muslim Terrorists', is invariably attacked by 'suicide bombers'. How do we know this? Because the New York Times always tells us so, that is how. No matter whether it is a truck in Baghdad, a bus in Tel Aviv, a car in Moscow or a train in Chechnya, the American media villain of the piece is always the ubiquitous Muslim suicide bomber.

The only people capable of knowing in the early stages that suicide bombers were not used in Madrid, and that 'suicide bombers' could therefore not be mentioned by media at all, for fear of alerting local police to those damning video surveillance tapes at Alcala de Henares, were members of the terrorist group responsible for executing the attack. In turn, the only terrorist group capable of controlling the editorial content of the New York Times is N.O.S. [Novus Ordo Seclorum], which draws its funding from Wall Street, its intelligence from B'nai B'rith, and its depraved Special Forces muscle from Tel Aviv.

Before moving on later in the report to prove this beyond doubt, by explaining exactly how the terrorist attack was conducted on the morning of Thursday 11 March 2004, we first need to examine the motive, because most people spend an enormous part of their time asking the age-old question "Why?" Forget all artful media attempts to drive you towards a World Trade Center lookalike strike, based largely on the indisputable fact that the attack on Madrid took place exactly 911 days after the New York strike on 9-11. Rest assured the attack date was arranged in advance by N.O.S., in order to assist its media collaborators with the propaganda to follow.

Clearly 'ordinary' citizens had to be taught a sharp lesson that Muslim terrorists were real, and that all Australians should therefore allow John Howard and his lesser Zionist lackeys to impose whatever Draconian restrictions they wished on the populace, and further allow Australian servicemen to die overseas for George W. Bush. By early October 2002 the sharp lesson was ready, and a sophisticated multi-pronged N.O.S. terrorist operation was launched against Australian tourists on the popular holiday Island of Bali. More than 200 died and over 1,000 were seriously injured. Are these precise numbers starting to ring any alarm bells anywhere about the Madrid operation?

While Bali did very little in terms of altering the cynical Australian view of 'Terror', it did have the effect of embarrassing many citizens into silence, in other words Howard and his lackeys were then able to dispatch servicemen overseas to die for George W. Bush and his Zionist masters, without being continually mobbed by crowds of angry Australians. A handful of semi-literate Indonesia Muslims were later picked up and injected with scopolamine until they made ridiculous and impossible confessions about the sophisticated bombings in Bali, and that was the end of that, at least so far as Australia was concerned.

Over the next eighteen months in Spain things got even worse than they had been in Australia. Where 90% of all Australians had opposed military intervention in the Middle East, the figure in Spain rose as high as 96% , until at one point it seemed as though the only Spaniard determined to sacrifice Spanish servicemen in Iraq for George W. Bush and his Zionist masters, was Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar. Because of his truculent defiance of the wishes of the Spanish people, Aznar was sure to be voted out at the next general election, which made the timing of the N.O.S. attack in Madrid a masterstroke.

When Aznar was finally thrown out at the general elections [which happened just a few hours ago], the media would be able to claim that Spaniards were angry with him for not doing enough in the 'War on Terror' to prevent the Madrid attack, when in reality Aznar had already done so much in terms of supporting George W. Bush and his cronies, that he had managed to alienate more than 90% of the entire Spanish population.

The Madrid attack also served to badly frighten the Spanish people in general, and to warn the new incoming Socialist Prime Minister that he has better toe New York's line, or more N.O.S. attacks would be sure to follow. Certainly Spain will be allowed to withdraw her troops from Iraq, because that particular crazed neocon invasion is already a lost cause, but future cooperation in the ongoing religious crusade against Islam generally is not negotiable.

One of the biggest illusions of the Madrid operation, lay in convincing you the public that a large crowd of nimble terrorists just hopped on board all four trains as they were 'passing through' Alcala de Henares railway station on the down platform towards Atocha.

Now think about this carefully. In my personal view each of the ten blasts would have required between 40 and 50 pounds of high-order military explosive in the C4/Semtex-H category. Such explosives have a very low specific gravity, meaning they are exceptionally bulky for their given weight. Therefore, this would have required ten [strong] terrorists on the down platform at the same time, each lugging a huge haversack in the middle of the rush hour. Strange then that no eyewitness at Alcala de Henares remembers seeing any of them, for these bulky gentlemen would most certainly have stood out in the crowd, and caused considerable suspicion among the commuters.

As mentioned earlier, this was the reason why the creative N.O.S. directed the western media to send the Spanish police off in various different directions for a while immediately after the attack, which kept them so occupied that they forgot to check the surveillance cameras at Alcala de Henares railway station. Had police done so, or should they do so now if the tapes still exist, they will see only Spanish commuters on their way to work.

So exactly where did N.O.S. bomb-up the four different trains, how did they do it, and how could they be sure each train would be in the right place when they pressed the remote detonation triggers? For the answer to that, take a look at the railway map below, which shows the procedure to be relatively simple, provided of course that you have unrestricted access to the trains themselves, and unrestricted access to the secure Spanish Rail system computers.

Now we can take another look at the pictures at the top of this page. Obviously by now you have found the first clue, i.e. that there was no fire at any of the ten blast sites, proving in turn that high-order military explosives were used in considerable quantities. Smuggling anything up to 500 pounds of very low specific gravity C4 into Spain would be extremely difficult nowadays, unless of course you already owned or controlled discrete facilities not normally inspected by Spanish Customs or the Police. It seems likely that even the most cynical of readers will be prepared to admit that ten big bearded Muslims, trying to lug giant haversacks of explosives into the country, would be instantly detected by even the most intellectually-challenged of customs officers.

The second clue relates to the pattern of the blast. If you look very carefully, you will note that some of the fragments buried in the shredded roof panels, are in fact shrapnel from the floor of the carriage itself. Without going into too much technical detail [there is plenty of that for reference in the Bali report linked below], it is impossible for bits of the floor to become embedded in the roof, unless the charges were fixed BELOW the floor before detonation. This is borne out by the fact that the train disabled outside Atocha station had its back completely broken in two different places. Once again, haversack charges casually placed on top of the internal floor, would be completely incapable of shattering the strong steel longitudinal support girders running the entire length of the chassis of each carriage.

Because it is impossible to attach sophisticated explosive charges on the underside of moving trains, obviously they were placed on the rolling stock under cover of darkness, while the trains were stationary during the night. This brings us to the next major illusion, uncovered by me after a series of very expensive calls from unlisted mobile phones. Though the western media deliberately led you to believe that these trains were 'just passing through' on continual services, that is not the case. Every one of the four trains were 'first service', i.e. each was making its first run of the day from its respective overnight depot, after being serviced and cleaned.

So now we know where the charges were placed, but how was it managed? Night depots are traditionally well-lit and well guarded, meaning that the bombers must have looked credible, or bribed their way into the depots, or were actually carry convincing Spanish Rail identity cards, real or forged. Because relying on chance credibility or handfuls of hard cash at the gates would be considered crude unacceptable risks for an operation of this importance, it is beyond reasonable doubt that Spanish Rail identity cards were used.

Nor does it stop there. Just picking any old train to bomb-up would be hopelessly inadequate, because there would be no guarantee that the random bombed-up train would even be put into service in the morning, much less be in exactly the correct position at the right time, for the planned maximum media impact. To do this the bombers needed access to rolling stock allocation for the following morning, which means they had direct access to the secure Spanish Rail computer system. We are not talking homespun Basques or 'al Qaeda' desert Muslims here, now are we? This was a highly professional operation, organized on sovereign Spanish territory by 'sleepers' who knew the lay of the land, and in all probability had lived in Madrid most or even all of their lives.

These organizers facilitated entry for the professional Special Forces team selected for the job, and here we come down to a choice of only one state. Though I am aware there are dozens of paranoids out there who believe that American, British, French and other western Special Forces delight in killing innocent civilians, you can take it from me that this is simply not the case. In a perceived 'war zone' like Iraq it is certainly true that all soldiers kill civilians from time to time, either by accident or out of fear for their own lives, but targeting hundreds of unarmed civilians on their way to work in an essentially neutral country, requires a cold-blooded mentality quite beyond the reach of organizations such as Delta Force or the Special Air Service, to name but two examples.

The only people with sufficient field experience for a job like this, and the total disregard for human life needed to carry it off successfully, are the direct descendents of the Myahudi monsters who raped and shot their way through the Muslim Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps in Lebanon all those years ago, which is why N.O.S. still uses them exclusively for its international wet work. It is beyond any doubt that false flag operations like Madrid will continue unabated, until the red tide finally overwhelms the Jewish State, and forces its occupants back into the primordial slime from whence they first emerged.

Copyright Joe Vialls, 15 March 2004

Prior Knowledge?

For all the money we spend on those so-called "intelligence" services, they aren't very good at anything are they? The only thing they seem any good at is spying on us little people! Prior warnings of 911, prior warnings of 11M, either the information isn't getting through - in which case it's the intelligence services that are guilty of gross negligence - or, the info is getting through and is being ignored by the political weenies - in which case those fuckers are guilty. Either way it demonstrates that our governments are completely and utterly useless at the job they are supposed be doing! The only thing those morons can think of involves curbing our freedoms and increasing the intrusion into our daily lives by their cops, CCTV cameras and Echelon - and all of that kit still doesn't do them any fucking good in stopping the bombs! Make no mistake, the world is a more dangerous place because of their lies, corruption, ineptitude and bogus ideology!

Spanish Interior Ministry was making security preparations for a terrorist attack, days before the blasts

The Spanish Ministry of Interior was on maximum alert, just days prior to the terrorist attack in Madrid. The ministry deployed over 200 agents, heavily-armed and equipped with riot gear. Officials stated that the reason for the security alert was to protect the nation's capitol against a possible terror attack from the Basque ETA terrorist group.

The security forces were convinced that the ETA terrorists were going to return to Madrid, in spite of their previous attempt to smuggle explosives into the capitol. Just two weeks ago, t he police in Spain reported they had foiled a big attack by the Basque separatist guerrillas, ETA. Police arrested two suspected members of ETA as they drove towards the capital, Madrid, in a pick up truck carrying eleven hundred pounds of explosives.

Today, more than 190 people were killed and some 1,247 injured in a series of bomb blasts, which ripped through three Madrid railway stations.

Two days before what has been called ‘the worst attack in Western Europe since World War II,' the riot police in Madrid began setting up checkpoints in order to find cars with explosives. They began patrolling commercial areas, train stations, airports, stadiums, large crowds and government buildings. The officers were also in charge of patrolling the so-called ‘hot neighborhoods,' in Madrid, where ETA terrorists have known to hide.

The police presence had become visible since last Monday, when an ‘immediate response security team' was deployed. The immediate response team also conducted night air surveillance, using helicopters equipped with night vision cameras.

Full story...

The West Was Warned.

If the Spanish election is any judge then we are not as stupid as they like to think we are. We know who the real terrorists are, Tony...

Now It Is Paying The Price Of The 'War On Terror'

by Robert Fisk

They had been warned. The Aznars and the Blairs and the Bushes had been told by those who were their allies - France and Germany and many others, not to mention the Arabs - that their crusade against al-Qa'ida could most cruelly rebound upon them. The Madrid bombings are not only a terrible revenge for Spain's participation in "part two" of the "war on terror" - the illegal invasion of Iraq - but a cruel and incrementally more painful attack on civilians by al-Qa'ida.

If America's neo-conservatives believe in the "war of civilisations", then so does al-Qa'ida: what other effect could the Madrid slaughter have in the West than to reinforce the notion - however preposterous historically - that Islam and the West were in conflict? Civilians are now to die in Europe as brutally as they have died in Bali and Tunisia and Istanbul and - let us, for a moment, see the world through another prism - as they have been torn to pieces by our bombs in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Sources close to Osama bin Laden's organisation are puzzled about the strange message, supposedly from the attackers, which was printed in the Arabic language paper Al-Quds al-Arabi. It suggested that the initial response to Spain's involvement in Iraq was the attack on Italian troops in Kerbala - if real, it would surely have referred to the killing of seven Spanish intelligence officers near Hilla. Using a public statement to order its own "cells" to make more attacks does not show the desperate discretion which al-Qa'ida normally shows in its communications.

But the arrests in Spain, the mobile phone calls, the sheer scale of the train bombings shows an al-Qa'ida as confident and ruthless as ever - and now resolved to attack in Europe. If the right foot fell in Istanbul and the left foot fell in Madrid, where, geographically, will the next right foot fall? We can take out an atlas and a ruler and work it out for ourselves.

I don't believe this is the Third World War. Nor is it a "war on terror". Nor is it a "war of civilisations". But our own leaders are wilfully leading us into a period of appalling suffering because they will not address the causes of injustice in the Islamic world. Repeatedly, our leaders were told of the consequences of participation in America's Iraqi folly. They lied to us. They told us about weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist, about links between Iraq and 11 September 2001 that didn't exist. Now, trapped in Iraq, we are desperate to scuttle away, leaving behind us a half-trained force of collaboration police who will - supposedly - shed their blood for ours.

Full story...

Spanish Election Blow To Bush's War On Terror

The people have spoken! I always thought the Spanish were smart, now they've proved it!

Spain's socialists defeated the conservative government in the general election last night, delivering a serious blow to the American-led war on terror.

The government was swept from power amid public disenchantment with its policy on Iraq and its conduct following the Madrid train bombings, in which 200 people were killed and 1,400 injured. It persisted in blaming the Basque extremist group Eta.

Now there are growing indications that al-Qa'eda bombers carried out the Madrid massacre in an attempt to influence the election result.

The government conceded defeat as the Socialist Workers' Party and its radical allies easily won a majority of seats in the 350-member Cortes.

With 99.4 per cent of the votes counted, the Socialists led the ruling People's Party by 42.6 per cent to 37.7 per cent. This would give them 164 seats to 148 for the PP. Turnout was 77 per cent.

Prime minister Jose Maria Aznar's party had been well ahead in opinion polls.

Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, the Socialist leader, said: "My most immediate priority is to beat all forms of terrorism," after asking for a minute's silence for the victims.

The Socialists have promised to withdraw 1,300 Spanish troops from Iraq.

Full story...

Don't flinch in fight against terror, warns White House
You are free - to do as we tell you! You are free - to do as we tell you! You are free - to do as we tell you!