Thursday 17 October 2002

Bali Disco Bombing - Another US "Inside Hit."

Incisive, witty and factually accurate, just like everything else I've come to expect from the vox-meister. Forget about what type of bomb it was and lets focus on whodunnit. Can I just say for the record, I'd be more likely to believe that a herd of venomous demented kangaroos was responsible for this atrocity than bin Laden and his mates. Anyway, read what voxfux has to say, it's worth it.

by voxfux

It’s not hard to find pieces of the puzzle that just don’t fit. That’s why the dark force spent years obliterating American’s critical capability. So that the pieces that just don’t fit don’t even get noticed.

Here's a piece that doesn't fit.

They expect us to believe that the same Islamic Terrorists who supposedly masterminded the Sept. 11th attacks, (Arguably the most significant MILITARY strikes in the history of empires, shaking at the very roots, the globe’s preeminent empire.) would blunder and bomb the disco containing Australians when a disco full of juicy American was just a few doors down the road?

One only has to spend an afternoon on the strip to find out which places are popular with the Americans. Even Islamic terrorists can ask any Kuta vagrant which club has the Americans in it.

And absolutely , positively, if Islamic terrorists were behind this attack they would have gone straight to the discos frequented by Americans only several doors down the street, and bombed them.

So voxfux gives this attack, this months award for being, “The Most Suspicious Attack - Looking Most Like Just Another Clandestine US military/Intelligence Attack of the Month” award.

Since American journalist’s don’t have the courage or grey matter to make such obvious extrapolations, thebiggest clues go completely unnoticed, unreported, uninvestigated. So forget about mainstream media. (Most US journalists have never even heard of the Northwoods memo - so the depth and magnitude of the ignorance is profound.)

News must now be almost entirely extrapolated by independent and trusted sources. A good source such as or [or even! - ewar] will have an 80% accuracy rate of extrapolation from the actual 1 or 2 percent of viable data gleaned from the semeiosphere of total bullshit. The other 20% of the 80% of correct extrapolation can be error. But that is still better than the near 95% of corporate news, which is as everyone now knows, pure fabrication, designed only to further an elite few’s industrialist goals, and take away every thing you own.

So if you believe the major media’s version of events - congratulations - you’re a big part of the “Problem.”

Full story...